www.davidhegg.org

275. Two things

Money is two things; a means of payment and an instrument of power.

After that; the same can be said about economy; it is a payment system and a power system.

What is it money and economy first and foremost is? That depends on what it is made to be, and how you look at it. These are two distinct sides of what money and economy are. Here I have wanted to clarify these two sides. What this first and foremost is, is also something it is sensible to consider what can be.

It is possible to impart nuances to and vary the definitions about this. In unequal different situations this can go on in unequal different ways. I think that the “criminals” want the people to believe, that the development is due to something we have to, and that it isn’t something the people can control by themselves what shall be. This works in this way; that it is like this the “criminals” decide and force through, against the people, how the development becomes.

It becomes obvious to think about that the “criminals” use much money as an instrument of power, to after that be able to use much money as a means of payment. But all the time I think about that it is different things with the “criminals”, and that I don’t know what they really exactly are doing.

▪

Now; at the same time with this, I also have thought about something else. When I grew up, in the 50s, 60s and 70s, I typical saw grocer’s shops which were built with the shop on the ground floor, and with the home of the shop owner on top of the store. This way of doing it, could also be common for other businesses.

At that time when it was usual, that many shops were built in this way, I think that it was an intermediate stage in the plans by the“criminals”. Many ordinary people should at that time, have it as an ideal to be able to be doing many small businesses. But the plan was already at that time, that this decentralized property‐power‐structure, later should be taken from them by powerful centralized property‐power‐structures.

This intermediate stage which I could see around me in the 50s, 60s and 70s, was because many should believe in this ideal of society, about decentralized property and power, because the “criminals” on the basis of this intermediate stage in their plans, later could “influence” to that powerful monetary power later could take it from them. The ideal about that many could own a little, should prepare the way for that a few shall own everything. This has gone on in that way; that the different big powerful business managements have developed themselves like this, that it has become impossible for the many individual citizens to run their own businesses.

It seems as something typical; that the “criminals” start with “influencing” people to be, and be doing, what they want to destroy. In connection with that I also think about something the person who “influenced” me in 1975 said: “First you shall continue to be the person who others are used to that you are. But that isn’t now any longer you. That has become that it is me here, who now control the person who you are, from now on. ”

All the time people are used as different playing counters by the “criminals”, and the “criminals” use these human counters completely cynical and ruthless, independent of if they are poor or rich. I think that the “criminals”, look at other people as nothing. Other people are only something they control, destroy and do anything they want with.

▪

Now finally; when I finish this text, I think this: What goes on; is all the time what not is being said. What is being said; is all the time what not goes on.

…What happens; is what we all the time not get to know. What we get to know; is all the time what not happens.

October 11, 2020, David H. Hegg