Factors Comment Factors is a text I wrote October 21, 2018. In this text I write about how what happened against me in 1986 was a series of planned factors. And I write about how I think about doing something with an “influence”. October 21, 2018. Factors Now I can see what happened against me in 1986, as a series of factors forming a whole and thought out plan. I think that when the criminals in 1975 planned to do what they did against me in 1986, they already in 1975 knew; that this series of factors would work, as they had planned. It wasn’t a series of coincidences, but a series of compounded planned moves. Because of that, the problem has been that these “influences” work as they do. The criminals know that the “influences” work with so strong effect, that they already beforehand know, that it afterwards will work when they do it in the way they know that will work. It is necessary to know how strong effect such “influences” have, to understand how strongly they work. How extensive this was arranged, was also something incomprehensible in 1986. The “influenced” people didn’t know or understand anything about that they were so strongly “influenced”. “Influenced” people are also “influenced” to protect themselves against understanding about that they are “influenced”, so they in that way hide the “influences” inside themselves without knowing that they do that. “Influenced” people don’t know or understand what they are doing, and they cannot see the consequences of their own “influenced” behavior, which can have to do with much more, than what happens in the particular situation. In this way, people can believe it is a small happening, when it really is a part of a big and much more extensive plan. The “influences” take over oneself in a way, which it is necessary to understand; and they change thoughts, feelings and memories etc. It is necessary to be more critical of all kinds of things which happen to oneself, and to think about how such “influences” can “influence” oneself in different ways. To understand about this, starts up one’s own reactions, but it is still necessary to think about how the “influences” still “influence” one’s reactions. But to start to know correctly about what this is; that is the necessary turning point. When I now have understood correctly about my situation, then the trickery regarding that situation has been stopped. I think the most important trickery was misinformation. For me it looks like that. That was because I was “influenced” to only find out wrong about all of this. These criminals aren’t subordinate any branch of government. They are only private individuals with possibilities to build something like this. Because of that, no one knows anything about them; it is therefore they can do what they are doing. When people are “influenced”, then they at the same time also are “influenced” to not understand about this. When we know about the criminals, without their knowledge about it; then we know something, which they don’t know. We also have possibilities, and we are many. It is important to understand how the criminals have played us all off against one another to weaken us. It seems for me, as the criminals want to ruin for us all how we all can agree about facts which is true. That is what characterizes our modern development, that we want to find out about what is true; and that we accept what is true. The criminals have confused us very much in many different ways. When people make war against one another, they all lose, and it is the criminals who win; because it is the criminals who have “influenced” them to make war. Something typical with what these criminals are doing, as I can understand it; is that they in different ways, build up combinations of “influences” in individuals, groups of people, societies, in parts of the world and in the whole world. ▪ Just now I thought about that I am “influenced” to drink too much coffee, and to get too much caffeine so that disturbs the sleep. As a solution to that problem, I thought that I can drink the first cup of coffee with ordinary instant coffee, and the next cups with decaffeinated instant coffee, or instant cereal coffee and such. This is a simple example of something I just now have thought about that I can do, because I think about that I am “influenced” to do something wrong. I think this is something which has been like this since 1975. It isn’t normally something wrong to drink coffee; but it is something wrong, or a bad habit, to drink too much coffee. Another solution is of course to only drink one cup when I understand this, therefore this is an illustrative example of how I in this example have changed what happens. The “influence” is, that after one cup, I want one cup more, and after that, even one cup more, and this continues that way. It is possible to discuss whether it is best to change something like this coffee “influence”, or if it is best to totally put it right instead of changing it. I have started to think about that, after I now have written about how I changed this. This coffee “influence” has been something for me in many years. For some years I was “influenced” to drink much coffee to stimulate me to find out of these “influenced” wrong clues. I am also “influenced” to drink too much coffee only as a bad habit. I think it is sensible to think about this. To change something like this from being something bad, to be something good, can be sensible. But it is also sensible to think about that the best is to stop as much of these “influences” as possible, to achieve as much as possible to get all of this away from oneself. After having thinking about this, I think that it is best to get as much as possible of these “influences” away from one’s inner life. But it doesn’t hurt to drink something else than coffee. Normally it isn’t any problem to drink some cups of coffee daily; some people also prefer to drink tea. I think that a little, or a common amount of such, is enough to stimulate one’s thoughts in a sensible way. It is exactness and such things which are important, when we find out about things. To normalize this totally, seems to be the best, when I have thought more about it after I now have written this text. For some time, it can be useful to change this coffee “influence” as a changeover to permanently overcome the “influence”. It helps to discuss it and think about it; after that, my experience of it has developed and I more fully understand about it in a wider perspective. An “influence” like this coffee “influence” has its intention of changing one’s daily habits. After having overcome “influences” like this, it is necessary to remember it and take care of it, otherwise the “influences” and the combinations of them imperceptible will creep up on oneself again. It is useful to create active habits which actively work against such “influences”. Generally speaking it is important to find out about how to start with good habits, which work against destructive and bad habits. Such good habits must also be possible to live with over time in the long run. The criminals can typical“influence” people to do too much, to afterwards get them to totally give in and not continue with things. To “influence” people to begin to do one “influenced” thing, to “influence” this to gradually turn around to the opposite “influenced” thing, is another typical method. This is that it all is “influences” by the criminals; nothing of it is by oneself. The first is an “influence”, and the opposite it ends with, is also an “influence”. This can also be to betray an “influence” with another “influence”. Another method of different methods, is to take up peoples time with things which shouldn’t have been there. The “influences” by the criminals can have been done in all thinkable ways. Typical they try to trick people in ways they don’t think about and understand. Such “influences” can also be transferred between people as social phenomena. It helps to discuss these things; that widens our perspective, and gets us to understand more about these things. I think about that a discussion isn’t the same as a debate. A discussion tries to understand and find out about things. A debate takes up disagreements. I think the criminals understand this. A debate where the debaters in the end don’t want to see one another anymore; is something different than a discussion where the participants in the end agree with one another. It is possible to debate to disagree more. It is possible to discuss to agree more. Sunday , October 21, 2018, David H. Hegg |