www.davidhegg.org

Friday, November 6, 2015

In the message, October 27, I wrote about how I saw another delivery code for one of the newspapers I deliver on my newspaper round. I think about how this is an influence, which is a consequence of something. The activating factor is that I look at that code, to deliver that newspaper. The consequence is that the code change to a code for another newspaper.

An activating factor, and a consequence, are two aspects which recur in different influences. I have thought about that this principle can be seen in other examples.

For example: To remember something, can be an activating factor to forget that. To like something, can be an activating factor to not like that. To want to do something, can be an activating factor to not want to do that. That you like something, can be an activating factor to not like that. This systematism can be done more or less specified; exact for one thing, or generally.

I have found out that it typical is possible to counteract and hinder influences when you understand them. Typical such influences work because you do not understand them. But some influences also happen without one's knowledge about it. But if you understand something, that works against all types of influences.

David H. Hegg