www.davidhegg.org

236. Opposite freedom

One of the different effects of the “influences” is how these “influences” get the “influences” to be oneself, and ourselves. This is a simple trickery. It takes time to adapt oneself to the state it is to find out about and understand about this. People are always marked by what is around them, so that is something normal, but the “influences” by the criminals are something different. “Influences” can be used to different things; get you to be interested in something you otherwise hadn’t started to think about; get you to not be interested in something; like or dislike something or someone; be energetic or lazy; suddenly do or say something; and different other things.

Before this text I have thought about how “influences” can get people to experience that they become free and achieve freedom, when the “influences” get control over them and displace themselves. I have thought about that the criminals take away people’s freedom in this way. This is one of different aspects with these “influences” and what the criminals are doing. In a way the criminals get their own freedom to have power over others, when they take away others freedom to have power over themselves.

If we here concentrate on the issue about freedom; I first think about that the criminals in the beginning started to change the original concepts of freedom. It is also likely that they from the beginning did different other things also. Afterwards they have done more and more regarding both old and new concepts of freedom, and they have thought of concepts of freedom which only are their own destructive fabrications.

The first example I get in my mind, is the hippie movement in Western countries from in the end of the sixties. One of the concepts of freedom in that movement could be that the men should be allowed to have long hair, and get freedom in that way. It is likely that the hippie movement was something the criminals had thought of, and it hasn’t become something lasting from that movement, all of it has only crumbled away. It is likely that the criminals took control over the people who joined the hippie movement, either directly by “influences”, or indirectly by how people become interested in it. In that way, people lost the freedom they otherwise had wanted to develop in another way, and became under control by the criminals who wanted to ruin for them instead.

This example with the hippie movement is an example of how people sought for freedom, in a way where they were tricked to lose their freedom. This happened in a way people where “influenced” to, and they didn’t understand what it was. When we start to understand about these things, then it becomes possible for us to begin to understand different other such things also. The criminals “influence” us to struggle to get freedom in ways, that get us to lose freedom and come under control of the criminals instead. In a way it is the criminals’ “influences” that get freedom and possibilities, to ruin the freedom and possibilities for us.

Opposite freedom is how people are “influenced” to struggle for freedom in ways that get them to do things, that take the freedom away from them. This happens in a way people don’t understand. Of course opposite freedom is a way of saying this, which is self‐contradictory; because it isn’t freedom. That is also what I have in mind; this is a false imagination which is the opposite of freedom.

In this text I only have started to bring this way of looking at this to the fore. I think it is something typical that the criminals “influence” people to struggle for different goals, in ways that get people to reach the opposite. A typical systematic method is a step by step development of the “influences”.

March 1, 2019, David H. Hegg